#Auditory processing issues professional

Moreover, the participants may have had a wide range of unidentified issues. The results of any study that uses the metric of “suspected of CAPD” or “listening difficulties” cannot be relied upon, because one cannot be sure whether the participants in the study presented any type of true auditory deficit. 8-10 Drawing conclusions based on performance of poorly defined participants poses significant threats to the validity of the research. 4-7 We would argue that many of the conclusions reached in these reviews were based on reports that included participants “suspected of CAPD” and/or relied on parent or teacher reports as substitutes for diagnosis based on evidence. Several recently published reviews of the literature pertaining to diagnosis and intervention for CAPD in children have reached conclusions critical of the very concept of CAPD, as well as the tools used to diagnose CAPD, and the benefits of auditory training. In our view, a number of controversial positions are the result of poorly designed research studies. Research Participants: “Diagnosed with” vs “Suspected of” CAPD Our goal is to provide information that will assist clinicians in making informed, evidence-based clinical decisions. In this article, we present our perspective on a number of these issues, with a focus on the current state of the evidence supporting our viewpoint. Nonetheless, a number of controversial issues continue to appear in the literature. 1 These recommended practices have been developed by consensus groups within the American Academy of Audiology (AAA) 2 and the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), 3 with careful consideration of the merits of various positions surrounding points of disagreement.

The recommended practices for diagnosis and intervention for central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) are dynamic, undergoing review and refinement as new research emerges. This article provides information that will assist clinicians in making informed, evidence-based clinical decisions about CAPD. A considerable body of research exists demonstrating the efficiency of individual central auditory tests and central auditory test batteries based on performance of individuals with confirmed CANS lesions, including such lesions in children.

#Auditory processing issues professional

While there is some variance in diagnostic criteria across US and European professional association guidelines, this simply reflects the need for additional research with participants with confirmed CAPD. Musiek, PhD, and Jeffrey Weihing, PhDĬentral auditory processing disorder (CAPD) is a complex and evolving subject, but remains a solid diagnostic entity. There is general scientific agreement on the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of CAPDīy Gail D.